Inter-American Accreditation Cooperation, A.C.

Inter-American Accreditation Cooperation, A.C.

Peer evaluator

Home / Peer Evaluators

What is a peer evaluator?

A peer evaluator is an individual qualified by an accreditation body and a regional accreditation cooperation (e.g., the Inter-American Accreditation Cooperation, IAAC) to take part in assessing the competence of other accreditation bodies or regional cooperations.

These evaluations are conducted within the international system of mutual recognition operated by Global Accreditation Cooperation Incorporated (GAC), formed by the merger of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) and the International Accreditation Forum (IAF).

Peer evaluators evaluate conformity with ISO/IEC 17011 and other applicable requirements through document evaluation, witnessing of on-site assessments, and analysis of the accreditation or recognition process, including decision-making.

According to procedure IAAC PR 004 and document IAAC MD 002, the following levels and roles of authorization exist for peer evaluators:

Level

Role Abbreviation Description
A peer evaluator leader TL Responsible for leading all phases of an evaluation, coordinating the team, making technical decisions and presenting the final recommendation.
A peer evaluator in training TTL Participates as a leader under direct supervision to gain experience before being authorized as a TL.
Designated Team Leader DTL Lead appraiser or TTL who is additionally appointed to support appraisal management and cover specific scopes of the MLA. Does not replace the TL or act in his/her absence by default.
A peer evaluator TM An authorized evaluator who covers specific technical scopes, writes findings and participates in technical analysis.
A peer evaluator in training TTM Candidate in training process who participates under supervision in technical tasks within the evaluation team.

Qualification and maintenance process

  1. Selection: Accreditation bodies nominate their experts.
  2. Training: Formal course with theoretical and practical evaluation.
  3. Supervised participation: At least one peer evaluator as TTM.
  4. Progressive authorization: According to accumulated experience and performance evaluation.
  5. Continuous monitoring: Post-activity evaluation (forms FM 007, FM 008, FM 009, etc.).